Stephanie Foretz vs Tina Krizan Head to Head Stats
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W L W W W W L L W L
Form
L L W L L W W L W LHead To Head: Foretz 1 - 0 Krizan
They have played 3 sets in total, with Foretz winning 2 and Krizan winning 1. The last match between Foretz and Krizan was at the AIG Japan Open Tennis Championships 2001 - Tokyo, 01-10-2001, Q1 round, Hard with Stephanie Foretz getting the victory 6-7(5) 6-1 6-4.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Stephanie Foretz | 1 |
| Tina Krizan | 0 |
AIG Japan Open Tennis Championships 2001 - Tokyo(01-10-2001)
6
7
6
1
6
4
| Foretz | Stats | Krizan |
|---|---|---|
| 50% (1-1) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| 457 | Ranking | Ret. |
| 62 | Highest Rank | 95 |
| 43 | Age | 51 |
| R | Plays | R |
| 7 | Titles | 0 |
| 54% (492-415) | Career Total W/L | 53% (156-139) |
| $444,403 | Career Prize Money | $2,230 |
| 1 | Hard H2H | 0 |
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Nishikori VS Shapovalov PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid atp
25 Apr 2025 / Second
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Medvedev VS Cerundolo PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid atp
27 Apr 2025 / Third
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-7(5) 6-1 6-4 | |||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 1 |
| 18 | Games Won | 12 |
| 0 | Aces (Total) | 0 |
| 0 | Total Double Faults | 0 |
| 0:0:0 | Average Match Time | 0:0:0 |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Serve Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 2nd Serve Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Return Points Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 100% (1/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Stephanie Foretz Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q2 | 6-2 4-6 17-15 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-3 6-1 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats 
Petra Martic
Player
Stephanie Foretz
61%
(
66 of
109)
1st Serve %
63%
(
64 of
102)
6
Aces
1
14
Double Faults
5
77%
(
51 of
66)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
41 of
64)
33%
(
14 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
19 of
38)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
40%
(
44 of
109)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
42 of
102)
107
Total Points Won
104
|
4-6 7-6(4) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Marina Melnikova
Player
Stephanie Foretz
61%
(
39 of
64)
1st Serve %
72%
(
53 of
74)
2
Aces
1
7
Double Faults
1
64%
(
25 of
39)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
31 of
53)
44%
(
11 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
7 of
21)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
44%
(
28 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
36 of
74)
72
Total Points Won
66
|
6-3 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Stephanie Foretz
Player
Melanie Oudin
81%
(
69 of
85)
1st Serve %
58%
(
52 of
90)
3
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
4
62%
(
43 of
69)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
36 of
52)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
15 of
38)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
38%
(
32 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
39 of
90)
92
Total Points Won
83
|
4-6 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Stephanie Foretz
Player
Mayo Hibi
57%
(
61 of
107)
1st Serve %
71%
(
89 of
126)
3
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
3
72%
(
44 of
61)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
45 of
89)
35%
(
16 of
46)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
19 of
37)
38%
(
8 of
21)
Break Points Won
71%
(
5 of
7)
44%
(
47 of
107)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
62 of
126)
122
Total Points Won
111
|
6-7(5) 7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Stephanie Foretz
Player
Magdalena Frech
61%
(
64 of
105)
1st Serve %
66%
(
69 of
105)
2
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
10
61%
(
39 of
64)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
45 of
69)
61%
(
25 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
15 of
36)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
39%
(
41 of
105)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
45 of
105)
109
Total Points Won
101
|
3-6 6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Stephanie Foretz
Player
Katy Dunne
75%
(
47 of
63)
1st Serve %
69%
(
40 of
58)
1
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
4
60%
(
28 of
47)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
20 of
40)
56%
(
9 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
8 of
18)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
41%
(
26 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
30 of
58)
67
Total Points Won
54
|
7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Sara Sorribes Tormo
Player
Stephanie Foretz
60%
(
29 of
48)
1st Serve %
63%
(
41 of
65)
1
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
2
72%
(
21 of
29)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
23 of
41)
53%
(
10 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
35%
(
17 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
31 of
65)
62
Total Points Won
51
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Stephanie Foretz
Player
Ya-Hsuan Lee
70%
(
57 of
82)
1st Serve %
66%
(
61 of
93)
5
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
72%
(
41 of
57)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
35 of
61)
52%
(
13 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
17 of
32)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
34%
(
28 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
41 of
93)
95
Total Points Won
80
|
6-7(6) 6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Tina Krizan Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q2 |
Stats
Tatiana Poutchek
Player
Tina Krizan
71%
(
42 of
59)
1st Serve %
66%
(
35 of
53)
0
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
1
69%
(
29 of
42)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
20 of
35)
71%
(
12 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
8 of
18)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
6)
31%
(
18 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
25 of
53)
66
Total Points Won
46
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Tina Krizan
Player
Isha Lakhani
73%
(
46 of
63)
1st Serve %
73%
(
38 of
52)
1
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
0
63%
(
29 of
46)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
18 of
38)
50%
(
26 of
52)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
26 of
63)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
44%
(
43 of
98)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
57 of
101)
63
Total Points Won
52
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF | 7-5 7-6(5) | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-2 6-1 | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 4-6 6-2 7-6(2) | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-7(5) 6-1 6-4 | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 6-2 6-1 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 7-6(4) 6-2 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-1 7-5 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 7-5 6-2 | H2H | |||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 54% (492/415) | Win/Loss | 53% (156/139) |
| 53% (1103/991) | Sets Win/Loss | 51% (338/326) |
| 51% (9796/9406) | Games Win/Loss | 51% (3100/2962) |
| 53% (141/126) | Hard Win/Loss | 45% (38/46) |
| 54% (160/138) | Clay Win/Loss | 55% (77/62) |
| 57% (147/112) | Indoor Hard W/L | 56% (9/7) |
| 53% (44/39) | Grass Win/Loss | 62% (23/14) |
| 0.06 | Aces Per Game | 0 |
| 565 | Aces Total | 3 |
| 0.11 | Double Faults Per Game | 0 |
| 1061 | Total Double Faults | 2 |
| 1st Match | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 547.53 | Average Opponent Rank | 391.47 |
| 58% (10324/17652) | 1st Serve % | 70% (81/116) |
| 61% (6299/10324) | 1st Serve Win % | 60% (49/81) |
| 44% (3242/7319) | 2nd Serve Win % | 49% (34/70) |
| 47% (920/1962) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 42% (5/12) |
| 44% (7241/16552) | Return Points Win % | 23% (26/111) |
| 45% (53/65) | Slam W/L | 38% (9/15) |
| 53% (29/26) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/2) |
| 100% (1/0) | Cups W/L | 65% (11/6) |
| 48% (140/149) | Main Tour W/L | 46% (18/21) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 61% (268/174) | Challenger W/L | 61% (72/46) |
| 50% (1/1) | Futures W/L | 47% (9/10) |
| 54% (486/898) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 53% (155/294) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 51% (92/180) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 54% (22/41) |
| 57% (163/288) | Deciding Set Win % | 63% (48/76) |
| 85% (476/404) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 90% (144/130) |
| 15% (476/70) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 10% (144/14) |
| 20% (431/86) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 17% (150/25) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
